2000 9000 iso standard

ISO Resources. Our Standards. ISO Related Topics. ISO Vs. ISO history and revisions: ISO , , and ISO was first published in by the International Organization for Standardization ISO , a specialized international agency for standardization composed of the national standards bodies of more than countries.

The ISO revision had five goals: Meet stakeholder needs Be usable by all sizes of organizations Be usable by all sectors Be simple and clearly understood Connect quality management system to business processes ISO was again updated in and ISO is the most current version. The revisions of the ISO series represent the most thorough overhaul of these standards since they were first published in The new versions take account of developments in the field of quality and the considerable experience that now exists with implementing ISO Pierre Caillibot, commented:.

Caillibot paid tribute to the national delegations of quality experts from 63 countries which participated in the development of the revised standards, in collaboration with 22 liaison organizations representing key business or economic groupings.

He added:. This standard is based on a number of quality management principles including a strong customer focus, the motivation and implication of top management, the process approach and continual improvement.

Using ISO helps ensure that customers get consistent, good-quality products and services, which in turn brings many business benefits. Discover them all. Checking that the system works is a vital part of ISO It is recommended that an organization performs internal audits to check how its quality management system is working. An organization may decide to invite an independent certification body to verify that it is in conformity to the standard, but there is no requirement for this.

The new standard is as applicable to a medical facility or a school as it to a manufacturing facility. With a broader appeal, there is no reason why the number of certifications under the revision should not double.

However, some organizations will find this less of a challenge than others will. Companies that have achieved ISO as a means of improving their business processes will have an edge. Companies that have made only a minimal commitment to ISO , who embraced it as a way to gain a marketing advantage or meet the demands of customers, may feel the new ISO hurts them. Nevertheless, ISO offers considerable advantages for them and their customers.

The transition is essentially the same whether a company was registered ISO , or ISO and thus become obsolete. With publication of the new standard, an organization has a maximum of three years to adopt the standard. In those three years, quality management systems conforming to the or standard will be acceptable. To meet the deadline, it is expected that organizations will start adopting the new requirements during their surveillance audits.

Thus, if all goes according to plan, the conversion process should be complete by the beginning of As a rule of thumb, organizations that are in the process of registering to ISO or who want or need to get registered by the end of , can register to the current version.

Still, they should begin modeling their system around ISO in anticipation of the conversion that follows. In general, the implementation process should not be significantly different for the revision than it was for the previous version.

Under ISO , businesses will no longer have the option of excluding activities they actually perform. Under the new regime, if you do it, you must include it as part of your ISO system. By incorporating such factors as customer satisfaction and continual improvement, ISO moves closer to the principles of TQM than its predecessor.

At the same time, it retains the discipline of third party assessment, registration and surveillance that has made ISO so successful. It is an inevitable evolution, which offers substantial benefits to organizations, their customers, and their suppliers. View all posts.